Evolution's Assumptions

A snake has been found that is, according to evolutionists, closing the argument as to how snakes evolved. It was found in Patagonia (Argentina), and has short legs. Evolutionists somehow know that this fossil is between 90 and 92 million years old.

Those same scientists have been arguing about whether snakes developed in a marine habitat or if they came to land and burrowed. This new fossil shows they must have burrowed. The fossil even seems to have an injury. This tells the scientists that the legs were used by the animal; therefore, they are an integral part of evolution.

Wow! All that from one fossil? Are these the lengths to which evolutionists have to go to hang on to their theory? Could the fossil not be a small lizard? Does it necessarily have to be that old, just because that is the only way it would fit in with their theory?

There is one more part to the story that comes as a total slap in the face to Bible believers. If this finding–and evolutionists’ assumptions about it–turned out to be true, then the Bible is false. The scientists know that, so they thought they would take a little “jab” at the Bible with their naming of the creature.

They named it “Najash rionegrina.” That name comes from the Hebrew phrase for “legged biblical snake.”

Kind…don’t you think? And we are supposed to be the “mean” ones!

To read more, click here to read the press release from The Hindu.